Partisans attacked American officers in Syria: what the US is hiding

More and more dissatisfied with the presence of the US military appears in Syria. If before the US soldiers felt frivolous and did everything they wanted, then the last two months became a real hell for them.

All because in several Syrian provinces, in which there are those same armed forces of the United States and their base, began to appear groups of Arab tribes fighting against Americans, or as they are called on the Web – partisans.

Partisans attacked American officers in Syria: what the US is hiding

Over the past two months, the US situation in the ATS has deteriorated noticeably, because during this time they were committed about 10 attacks, and in almost all of them they suffered serious losses.

The most notorious were the attacks in the province of Hasaka, where the base of Al-Shaddady is located, in which the US trains fighters. There the guerrillas blew up a column with servicemen on the mine, resulting in the six soldiers being killed. Another case was in Rakka – the soldiers were trapped in the partisans.

The question arises: why does the Pentagon hide its losses? There is a reason door for this. The first of these is the image of the “great” America. I am sure that the Ministry of Defense least want to spoil it, they do not just lie about the failed missile strike on April 14.

As for the second reason, the Americans do not want to publicize the fact that the inhabitants of Syria, its indigenous population, opposes the presence of the US in their home.

It is more likely that in the near future we hear a lot of news that the Syrian partisans are liquidating the US military.

Who was “fooled” with French strikes against Syria

Who was "fooled" with French strikes against Syria

Why do some Russian journalists believe any word of foreign politicians and military and do not believe their own, writes KP.ru.

Here, the editor-in-chief of the radio station Ekho Moskvy Venediktov burst out this morning: “… Of course, I wonder if, for example, Sergey Kuzhugetovich Shoigu will disappear from the government, and in his place, for example, Alexei Dumin will come, or Surovikin will come, I do not remember , as his name is, Vladimir or Mikhail, “says Venediktov. – But the policy is determined by the President of the Russian Federation …

If Shoigu does not, let’s assume, it will happen, for me it will be absolutely clear that the president was sick of being fooled and fooled. That’s, in fact, my debates in correspondence with Vladimir Pozner about it … Oh, thank God, I know about France. First our Ministry of Defense, then Posner, referring to high-ranking Russian sources, writes that the French promised the Americans to hit Syria and not hit. They struck. To do this, just go to the website of the French Ministry of Defense, the website of the French president. To do this, simply call the press service of the President of France. And they did not just strike, but coordinated the blows. Because the AWACS (long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft, – prim.avt.) Were ruled by the French. “

Who and who “fooled”, speaking about the participation of France in the missile strike on Syria on April 14? Let us turn to the original source.

At a briefing of the Russian Defense Ministry, a few hours after the completion of the missile strikes of the coalition, it was stated that (quoting verbatim) “the participation of French aviation has not been fixed,” unlike the US and British air forces. I will specify: in this case it was a question of the fact that the Russian military department did not have information about the participation of French combat aircraft in missile strikes against Syrian targets. About which it was directly and honestly said at the briefing.

As for the French AWACS, they could not launch missile strikes, because they are not meant for that, they just solve the supporting tasks. Dropping rockets and bombs on the heads of Syrians is one thing. And for a thousand kilometers from Syria to participate in the guidance of combat aircraft on targets – it’s completely different. But anyway, the truth is that the French still participated in the punitive operation. But only not with combat aircraft, but with ships (launching sea-launched rockets “Scalp”).

At the same morning briefing on April 14, the Russian Defense Ministry announced 103 rockets issued by the coalition in Syria. The coalition only at the end of the same day announced 105 rockets fired. That is, the error was less than 1%. And this is even by the strictest army standards, it is entirely permissible.

But as regards the effectiveness of the missile strike, there really are more than serious differences not in favor of the coalition. Including, of course, and France, whose reputation is so touchingly and zealously baked by Venediktov.

The Ministry of Defense of Russia not only declared about the downed missiles, but also showed their wreckage. Including – and French missiles with serial numbers of UNITS and other data confirming the “nationality” of the deadly products. True, this is for some reason kept silent by the French, and by the trusted “military experts” Venediktov. And it is easy to understand why – it is much more important for them to pinch the Russian Defense Ministry ritually, to accuse him of lying, to punch their foreheads against the Kremlin, and, in the end, to divert public attention from the fact that the “coalition” led by the US has been shamefully embarrassed.

It is strange only that with such a love of truth and a large number of “experts” in chemical weapons close to the radio station, Venediktov did not pay attention to the testimony of living witnesses from the Syrian Duma who participated in the production of the White Helmets. But this lie caused the missile strike on April 14. And now also the refusal of the State Department to finance this bumbling organization, which is working for him on the spot.

As for Venediktov’s fortunetelling that the President allegedly “gotten” the lie of the Defense Ministry and the GDP because of this can go on radical personnel reshuffles, if the editor-in-chief of Ekho accuses the defense ministry of fooling the head of state, cite and convincing (based on facts and only on facts!) evidence. But, apart from empty words, Venediktov does not have anything.

And further. One can not help but be surprised at the naivety of the editor-in-chief of Echo, who faithfully believes the truthfulness of French sources: “To do this, just go to the website of the French Ministry of Defense, the website of the French president, call the French president’s press office.”

This is hardly enough. Because all these instances either go away from honest answers, or dexterously lie. For example, that the coalition, including France, was hitting the chemical objects of Assad. And Venediktov believes that lies.

Read also: Fiery whirlwind: Russian “Snake Gorynych” destroys suicide bombers and snipers Igil in Syria (VIDEO)

Victor Baranets

Aksyonov explained the detention of a Ukrainian ship off the coast of Crimea

Aksyonov explained the detention of a Ukrainian ship off the coast of Crimea

Detention of the Ukrainian fishing vessel near the Crimean coast was made in accordance with Russian legislation and is designed to prevent damage to the Crimean region, said the head of the republic Sergei Aksyonov.

As previously reported “Russian Spring”, Ukrainian fishing vessel “YAMK-0041” illegally mining plaice in the exclusive economic zone of Russia (west of Cape Tarkhankut), was detained on Friday in the Black Sea by the border patrol ship of the Russian Federation “Ametist”.

The vessel and the crew – five Ukrainian citizens – were brought to the Crimea “for procedural actions”. The border guards stressed that they acted “in strict accordance with international maritime law”.

Press Secretary of the State Border Service of Ukraine Oleg Slobodyan, in turn, said that the detained vessel did not have permission to cross the Ukrainian-Russian border.

“All the actions carried out by the FSB frontier service were carried out in accordance with Russian law. Unfortunately, the Ukrainian authorities are determined to inflict the maximum damage to the Russian Crimea. Therefore, I am sure that all measures taken by the Russian Federation are correct and necessary, “wrote Aksyonov on his Facebook page.

Read also: Poroshenko got the US: Washington’s ultimatum and explosions in the warehouses of the APU

Syria was hit hard, but the Russian Federation did not use the S-400 to intercept missiles

Syria was hit hard, but the Russian Federation did not use the S-400 to intercept missilesThe media reported an “enemy” missile attack on the military bases of the Syrian army. The network has already got a video of air strikes.

Military bases in northern Syria were subjected to a missile strike. The main targets of the new attack were bases near Khama and Aleppo.

As reported by "Interfax" with reference to the SANA news agency, the Syrian authorities did not make statements about who is behind these blows, nor did they explain whether any damage was caused or if there were any dead.

Sounds of bursting shells were heard in these locations around 22:30 local time.

Syria was hit hard, but the Russian Federation did not use the S-400 to intercept missiles2 very funny videos about sexy …

The explosions were “consistent”. According to a number of interlocutors of the TV channel, they were aimed at positions of Iranian troops stationed on these bases. At the same time, other sources of Al-Arabiya claim that the explosions at the bases occurred as a result of a “fire on the ammunition stock belonging to the Assad regime”.

Attack, in particular, was the storage of weapons of the 47th brigade of the Syrian army in the vicinity of Hama. It is located between the airport of En-Nairab and El-Maliki. The fact that this particular facility was one of the targets of missile strikes, RIA Novosti confirmed the source in the law enforcement agencies of Syria. As a result of the attack, he said, “there were powerful explosions and a strong fire.” The other details of the incident have not yet been reported by the interlocutors.

According to the AFP, 26 military personnel, including those from Iran, were killed. NEWSru Israel reports that one of the targets was located not far from the Russian base of Khmeimim, and the Russian Federation did not use the S-400 complexes for interception.

The European-Mediterranean seismological center in the area of ​​explosions recorded an earthquake of magnitude 2.6 with an epicenter 16 km south-east of the city of Ham.

Arabic edition of Sky TV channel News reported that as a result of attacks on weapons stockpiles, at least 40 people were killed, more than 60 were injured. Already published video aviadar on Hama.

Jubilee failed: Venezuela leaves OAS

Jubilee failed: Venezuela leaves OASPresident of Venezuela Nicolas Maduro

70 years ago at the Inter-American Conference in Bogotá, at the initiative of the United States, the Organization of American States (OAS) was established. It includes most of the countries of the Americas – only 34 states with the exception of Cuba, which was excluded from the organization in 1962 after the transition to socialism.

The day before it became known about the possible withdrawal from OAS of another member country – on April 29, the Organization of American States received a corresponding notification from Venezuela.

A few days ago, President Nicolas Maduro announced the decision of Caracas to leave the OAS in a telegram sent to the organization. “Quite an interventionist arbitrariness and violation of the rule of law! Venezuela is the cradle of liberators. We will make us respect, “wrote Maduro.

    Kalashnikov automatic rifle of the new generation

Venezuelan Foreign Minister Delsi Rodriguez, in turn, announced that the country’s government does not intend to pay money for leaving the organization, although this item is prescribed in the charter. She also clarified that the procedure for Venezuela’s withdrawal from the OAS would take two years.

Caracas’s decision to leave the OAS was made against a backdrop of massive protests in Venezuela – citizens are opposed to the policies of President Maduro and demand his resignation.

The first many thousands of anti-government actions began in Venezuela in early April last year. During their time, hundreds of people were injured and arrested.

Venezuela’s policy is condemned by the United States and the Organization of American States. The head of the White House, Donald Trump, commenting on the situation in Venezuela, said that people suffer and die and there are many options for solving the problem in Venezuela. “Including a possible military option, if it is [necessary],” the American leader added.

According to Emil Dabaghyan, a leading researcher at the Institute of Latin American Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences, America has no right to intervene by force in the affairs of states. “Therefore, Trump’s intention to solve the issue with Venezuela with one stroke is unacceptable,” the expert said.

In turn, the leading specialist in Latin America of the Cato Institute in Washington, Juan Carlos Hidalgo, believes that the OAS is becoming increasingly inappropriate. “The Organization of American States is a reflection of the activities of its member states. It does not have its own identity, “the expert explains.

According to him, in the late 2000s and early this decade, the OAS and its Secretary-General, José Miguel Insulza, were determined left-wing assistants who dominated the region, even when some of their governments began dismantling their country’s democratic institutions such as Venezuela, Nicaragua and Bolivia. The situation began to change several years ago with the arrival of centrist governments in Argentina, Brazil and Peru, and with the election of Luis Almagro as Secretary General, who was very critical of the “chavista” regime in Venezuela, the expert continues.

“But even now, it is impossible to find a consensus in the OAS General Assembly on the destruction of democracy and the humanitarian crisis in Venezuela. That’s why other special groups were created, such as the Lima Group, “concludes the Cato expert in Washington.

The third article of the OAS statute states that “every state has the right to choose its political, economic and social system without outside interference and the right to adopt such a device that would correspond to it to the greatest extent.” However, in practice this did not always happen. During the existence of the OAS, its member countries – most often the United States – have often allowed themselves to interfere in the internal politics of other members of the organization and even to intervene against them.

For the first time, OAS member countries allowed themselves to intervene in the policies of another country in 1962, when they excluded Cuba from among the OAS members. After Fidel Castro’s 1959 revolution, Cuba was proclaimed a socialist republic.

Immediately after the Cuban revolution, the US considered the possibility of overthrowing the new government. There were many plans to destabilize the situation in Cuba, as a result, the US authorities decided to land the landing near the Bay of Pigs. The military operation was unsuccessful. The world community condemned the United States, around the world the demonstrators staged pickets and tried to storm the US diplomatic missions. The UN also called these acts an act of aggression.

However, the pressure on Cuba did not stop there. At first it was economic, and after, in 1962, the OAS suspended Cuba’s membership in the organization, arguing that the socialist path of development that the country had chosen was “dangerous” for America. In 1964, the organization also obliged all participating countries to cease diplomatic relations with Cuba.

In 2009, the OAS restored the membership of Cuba, but the Cubans refused to return.

Relations between the United States and Panama intensified in the mid-1980s after Panama refused to review the terms of the transfer of control over the Panama Canal. The agreement was signed in 1977 by the head of Panama, Omar Torrijos and US President Jimmy Carter, according to his conditions, by the end of 1999, Washington had to transfer control over the Panama Canal.

In 1987, the authorities of the Central American country refused to grant the United States its territory for conducting activities against Nicaragua. In addition, the Panamanian government began accusing the United States of interference in the internal affairs of its state. The answer was immediate – Washington stopped providing military and economic assistance to Panamanian colleagues, and in 1989 the US imposed economic sanctions on Panama, hoping to press on the government and achieve its overthrow.

The culmination of these disagreements was the US armed intervention in Panama in 1989, the operation was called “Just Cause”.

The international community condemned the US invasion, and the US explained its actions, citing the fact that the operation was conducted with the goal of “ensuring the safety of US citizens.”

The States permitted such an operation on the islands of Grenada. While the official wording also contained words about the “need to protect” Americans, the US landed in Grenada at the request and with the support of OAS countries.

As a result of the military coup in Grenada in 1979, the leftist movement “New Jewel Movement “led by Maurice Bishop, who headed for cooperation with socialist countries, such as the USSR and Cuba. The United States and many OAS countries were concerned that another country refused to go on a democratic path. As a result, the US announced a boycott of Grenada and began to conduct military exercises near the islands.

As a result of the internal split in the movement “New Jewel Movement “in Grenada was a coup, and Maurice Bishop was shot. Anarchy triumphed. According to the official version, for the introduction of peacekeeping forces, the United States invaded the islands.

The international community is at variance with the estimates of this military operation. However, upon its completion, the United States paid Grenada compensation for damage caused by the US Army.

The war for the Falkland Islands began between May 2, 1982. Although the islands were discovered by the British in 1690 and by the French – in 1694, Argentina from the beginning of the nineteenth century considered these islands their own.

The confrontation between Great Britain and Argentina in the struggle for the Falkland Islands was a long one, until the war. In 1981, Leopoldo Galtieri came to power in Argentina, who wanted to strengthen his popularity through the conquest of the islands.

In March 1982, several dozen Argentine workers landed on the island of South Georgia near the Falkland Islands under the pretext of parsing the old whaling station.

English soldiers tried to drive away the Argentines, but soon the Argentine troops approached the workers, and then the landing. The fighting began on May 1, 1982. The Government of Great Britain viewed the 1982 campaign as a defense against the Argentine invasion of the islands, which are a colony of Great Britain.

During the ten-week war for the islands, the United States provided the British with its military base on Ascension Island, which London used for British aviation. As a result of the military clash, Great Britain won.

The decision to provide the US military base clearly marked its position. At the same time, the US should, on the contrary, help Argentina, because according to the charter, “aggression against one of the American states is aggression against all the others.”

In Odessa, the denazification of Ukraine began.

Denazification of Ukraine began in Odessa

Mayor Gennady Trukhanov clearly learned something about the future of South Palmyra

Unexpected decision of the deputies of the Odessa City Council, abolished the renaming of urban toponyms, caused hysterics among the nationalists in Kiev. Deputy Rada Andrei Ilyenko called what is happening “creeping pro-Moscow revenge” and threatened to “squeeze out the secessionist pus” from the city. Meanwhile, Mayor of Odessa Gennady Trukhanov has already ordered to return the renamed streets the former names stolen from the city by guest Georgian guest Mishiko Saakashvili. What caused this demarche of the mayor of Odessa?

Among local politicians Trukhanov is considered to be the owner of the best political scent – his nose is better than the others caught by the winds blowing in the Odessa air. And if Trukhanov decided on a similar demarche, it means that he knows something that most Odessites do not even suspect. By the way, the prudent Trukhanov never handed over his Russian passport, although Saakashvili did nothing to force the Odessa mayor to give up principles and choose one passport from the two. Experts point out that Trukhanov’s demarche is somewhat reminiscent of the behavior of the Crimean authorities in January-February 2014: then suddenly the tone of statements of previously loyal to Kiev deputies of the Supreme Council of the autonomy changed dramatically. But then – statements, and Trukhanov and his deputies immediately switched from words to deeds. Now in Odessa there are no more streets of the traitor Mazepa and the Hitlerite Shukhevych, nor the avenue of the “heavenly hundred”. From the city they sweep away the legacy of the Maydans. And it is possible that the Maydanshchikov themselves will be swept away too soon.

In the meantime, the City Council is looking for funds for the production of new tablets with new old street names. Renamements are engaged in the cooperation of the mayor Oleg Bryndak, and, according to him, the city services have already returned the former names to the streets of Gaidar and Tereshkova, nine Chapaevsky lanes and Marshal Zhukov Avenue. According to Bryndak, the city authorities did not allow themselves any arbitrariness: they conducted a survey of the townspeople and found out that three-quarters of the residents of Odessa insisted on the return of the old names renamed under Saakashvili.

Meanwhile, the Maydans continue to hysterical. Deputy Andrei Ilyenko demanded that Petro Poroshenko immediately react to the demarche of the “Odessa separatists”: “

“Creeping pro-Moscow revenge in the southern and eastern cities of Ukraine is carried out by local MPs – separatists, who climbed into power and were hiding there.”

Ilenko agrees that it is unlikely that the deputies made the decision independently, without a hint from Moscow: they certainly assured the people’s deputies and promised something, perhaps, as Ilenko put it, “the Russian annexation of Odessa in the near future.”

“Today they are renaming the streets,” the Ukrainian deputy warned, “and tomorrow they will start persecuting patriots who gave them pepper in the 14th year. And it will be very soon. “

So it will be, no doubt.

P.S. Word only "patriots" in this context it is necessary to take in quotation marks, because the mature Raghulis are Bandera punishers, not patriots

PPPS The pans again snot, fainting and heart attacks.

https://cont.ws/@id359957569/932139

In Odessa, the denazification of Ukraine began.

Denazification of Ukraine began in Odessa

Mayor Gennady Trukhanov clearly learned something about the future of South Palmyra

Unexpected decision of the deputies of the Odessa City Council, abolished the renaming of urban toponyms, caused hysterics among the nationalists in Kiev. Deputy Rada Andrei Ilyenko called what is happening “creeping pro-Moscow revenge” and threatened to “squeeze out the secessionist pus” from the city. Meanwhile, Mayor of Odessa Gennady Trukhanov has already ordered to return the renamed streets the former names stolen from the city by guest Georgian guest Mishiko Saakashvili. What caused this demarche of the mayor of Odessa?

Among local politicians Trukhanov is considered to be the owner of the best political scent – his nose is better than the others caught by the winds blowing in the Odessa air. And if Trukhanov decided on a similar demarche, it means that he knows something that most Odessites do not even suspect. By the way, the prudent Trukhanov never handed over his Russian passport, although Saakashvili did nothing to force the Odessa mayor to give up principles and choose one passport from the two. Experts point out that Trukhanov’s demarche is somewhat reminiscent of the behavior of the Crimean authorities in January-February 2014: then suddenly the tone of statements of previously loyal to Kiev deputies of the Supreme Council of the autonomy changed dramatically. But then – statements, and Trukhanov and his deputies immediately switched from words to deeds. Now in Odessa there are no more streets of the traitor Mazepa and the Hitlerite Shukhevych, nor the avenue of the “heavenly hundred”. From the city they sweep away the legacy of the Maydans. And it is possible that the Maydanshchikov themselves will be swept away too soon.

In the meantime, the City Council is looking for funds for the production of new tablets with new old street names. Renamements are engaged in the cooperation of the mayor Oleg Bryndak, and, according to him, the city services have already returned the former names to the streets of Gaidar and Tereshkova, nine Chapaevsky lanes and Marshal Zhukov Avenue. According to Bryndak, the city authorities did not allow themselves any arbitrariness: they conducted a survey of the townspeople and found out that three-quarters of the residents of Odessa insisted on the return of the old names renamed under Saakashvili.

Meanwhile, the Maydans continue to hysterical. Deputy Andrei Ilyenko demanded that Petro Poroshenko immediately react to the demarche of the “Odessa separatists”: “

“Creeping pro-Moscow revenge in the southern and eastern cities of Ukraine is carried out by local MPs – separatists, who climbed into power and were hiding there.”

Ilenko agrees that it is unlikely that the deputies made the decision independently, without a hint from Moscow: they certainly assured the people’s deputies and promised something, perhaps, as Ilenko put it, “the Russian annexation of Odessa in the near future.”

“Today they are renaming the streets,” the Ukrainian deputy warned, “and tomorrow they will start persecuting patriots who gave them pepper in the 14th year. And it will be very soon. “

So it will be, no doubt.

P.S. Word only "patriots" in this context it is necessary to take in quotation marks, because the mature Raghulis are Bandera punishers, not patriots

PPPS The pans again snot, fainting and heart attacks.

https://cont.ws/@id359957569/932139

In Odessa, the denazification of Ukraine began.

Denazification of Ukraine began in Odessa

Mayor Gennady Trukhanov clearly learned something about the future of South Palmyra

Unexpected decision of the deputies of the Odessa City Council, abolished the renaming of urban toponyms, caused hysterics among the nationalists in Kiev. Deputy Rada Andrei Ilyenko called what is happening “creeping pro-Moscow revenge” and threatened to “squeeze out the secessionist pus” from the city. Meanwhile, Mayor of Odessa Gennady Trukhanov has already ordered to return the renamed streets the former names stolen from the city by guest Georgian guest Mishiko Saakashvili. What caused this demarche of the mayor of Odessa?

Among local politicians Trukhanov is considered to be the owner of the best political scent – his nose is better than the others caught by the winds blowing in the Odessa air. And if Trukhanov decided on a similar demarche, it means that he knows something that most Odessites do not even suspect. By the way, the prudent Trukhanov never handed over his Russian passport, although Saakashvili did nothing to force the Odessa mayor to give up principles and choose one passport from the two. Experts point out that Trukhanov’s demarche is somewhat reminiscent of the behavior of the Crimean authorities in January-February 2014: then suddenly the tone of statements of previously loyal to Kiev deputies of the Supreme Council of the autonomy changed dramatically. But then – statements, and Trukhanov and his deputies immediately switched from words to deeds. Now in Odessa there are no more streets of the traitor Mazepa and the Hitlerite Shukhevych, nor the avenue of the “heavenly hundred”. From the city they sweep away the legacy of the Maydans. And it is possible that the Maydanshchikov themselves will be swept away too soon.

In the meantime, the City Council is looking for funds for the production of new tablets with new old street names. Renamements are engaged in the cooperation of the mayor Oleg Bryndak, and, according to him, the city services have already returned the former names to the streets of Gaidar and Tereshkova, nine Chapaevsky lanes and Marshal Zhukov Avenue. According to Bryndak, the city authorities did not allow themselves any arbitrariness: they conducted a survey of the townspeople and found out that three-quarters of the residents of Odessa insisted on the return of the old names renamed under Saakashvili.

Meanwhile, the Maydans continue to hysterical. Deputy Andrei Ilyenko demanded that Petro Poroshenko immediately react to the demarche of the “Odessa separatists”: “

“Creeping pro-Moscow revenge in the southern and eastern cities of Ukraine is carried out by local MPs – separatists, who climbed into power and were hiding there.”

Ilenko agrees that it is unlikely that the deputies made the decision independently, without a hint from Moscow: they certainly assured the people’s deputies and promised something, perhaps, as Ilenko put it, “the Russian annexation of Odessa in the near future.”

“Today they are renaming the streets,” the Ukrainian deputy warned, “and tomorrow they will start persecuting patriots who gave them pepper in the 14th year. And it will be very soon. “

So it will be, no doubt.

P.S. Word only "patriots" in this context it is necessary to take in quotation marks, because the mature Raghulis are Bandera punishers, not patriots

PPPS The pans again snot, fainting and heart attacks.

https://cont.ws/@id359957569/932139

In Turkey, found the Bible, which should not be. The Vatican forbade it to read

In Turkey, archaeologists have discovered a Bible that undermines all the foundations of the Christian religion. A precious book, the age of which exceeds 1500 years, was hidden in the Ankara Chamber of Justice.

In Turkey, found the Bible, which should not be. The Vatican forbade it to read

Golden (literally) letters are printed on pages of thinly-made leather. The Bible is written in the Assyrian language – this is the Gospel of the disciple of Christ, Barnabas.

The Vatican has already stated that it does not consider this Bible to be canonical. Still, because the records of Barnabas do not correspond to the Bible approved at the Nicaea Cathedral.

In Turkey, found the Bible, which should not be. The Vatican forbade it to read

In particular, Barnabas calls Jesus a prophet, not deifying him. In this version, Judas fell on the crucifixion, and Jesus was taken to the sky alive.

The book remains under protection in the Ethnographic Museum of Ankara. It is known that several large world investors tried to buy the Bible, the value of which exceeds $ 30 million.

Satanovsky told how the US “untwisted” the Maidan in Armenia

Satanovsky told how the US "untwisted" the Maidan in Armenia

To keep abreast of the most important news and read the site without ads, subscribe to our Yandex widget. To do this, click on the link and click "Save".

The situation in Armenia is unfolding towards a big war, and the US goal in this case is to eliminate the base in the city of Gyumri. This opinion was broadcast on the radio of “Vesti FM” by political scientist Yevgeny Satanovsky, commenting on the protests in Armenia.

Satanovsky told how the US "untwisted" the Maidan in ArmeniaSyrian Kurdistan – terrorist Tortuga of the XXI century

While the events on the territory of this state are very cautious, as it is not entirely clear what to expect from them, said Satanovsky. According to him, the task of the US government is quite clear here – to destroy the base in Gyumri and everything connected with Russia. In addition, the Americans would not mind to aggravate the tension around Nagorno-Karabakh, the expert added.

Satanovsky told how the US "untwisted" the Maidan in Armenia

Source of the photo: vk.com – page of Yevgeny Satanovsky

At the same time, in Turkey and Azerbaijan, most likely, they are satisfied with everything that is happening in Armenia now, Satanovsky said. For example, the conflict over Karabakh in Azerbaijanis is a terrible trauma for the republic and its population, he said. And if this conflict “explodes” with new force, its consequences will be very long, the political scientist explained.

Satanovsky also talked about the situation with Kazakhstan, which allowed the US to use its ports to supply the NATO mission in Afghanistan. According to the expert, the president of this state, Nursultan Nazarbayev, has never used such bandit methods that the Americans can use against him, but he understands the price of the issue. This gun, attached to the temple – an offer that can not be abandoned, said the political scientist.

Unexpected turn of the “Armenian Maidan”: Pashinyan held talks with the State Department

Unexpected turn of the "Armenian Maidan": Pashinyan held talks with the State DepartmentUnexpected turn of the “Armenian Maidan”: Pashinyan held talks with the State Department –

The unrest in Armenia continues, but soon this internal conflict risks developing into something more because of external interference from the West. Preconditions for this already exist, as Washington once again moved away from the principles of non-interference in foreign domestic policy and gives special attention to one of the sides of the confrontation.

Leader of the Armenian opposition and head of the parliamentary faction “Exit” Nikol Pashinyan on his personal page in the social network Facebook told about the telephone conversations with a representative of the United States. According to the figure, he already had a chance to discuss with the assistant of US Secretary of State Wes Mitchell, the head of the State Department of Europe and Eurasia.

“I had a telephone conversation with the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, Wes Mitchell. We discussed issues related to a peaceful and legal settlement of the internal political situation in Armenia, “Pashinyan wrote.

Earlier it was also reported that this figure is officially now listed as a candidate for the post of head of government. Recently, he appealed to his supporters to stop the riots and various kinds of actions for a while.

Mass protests in Armenia began on April 13, 2018 due to the nomination of ex-President Serzh Sargsyan for the post of prime minister. By analogy with the Ukrainian “Maydan” these young people took part in these actions. As a result of the so-called “Velvet Revolution”, Sargsyan still left his post, having been in office for only a week. Now it is vacant and various figures of this country are fighting for a place in power.

The head of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin has already shown participation in this situation. In conversation with the interim Prime Minister of Armenia Karen Karapetyan, he expressed hope that the situation in Armenia will further develop in the legal field, with the observance of the constitution and on the basis of legitimate parliamentary elections, which will be held tomorrow – May 1.

Seoul turned on the back. What will happen to the US military contingent on the Korean peninsula?

The leadership of South Korea just a few days after the meeting with the representatives of the delegation of the DPRK, including Kim Jong-un, “switched on the back”. President of the Republic of Korea, Mun Zhe Ying, who stated at the meeting with his North Korean counterpart about the beginning of the “big peace process” and that Seoul and Pyongyang “are themselves capable of making progress in relations”, now hastened to announce that the US troops “should not leave The Korean Peninsula. ” This is reported by the information service Ryonhap.

The press service of the President of South Korea disseminates the message:

American troops in Korea have nothing to do with signing a peace treaty with the North. They are on the peninsula in the framework of the allied treaty between the Republic of Korea and the United States.

Seoul turned on the back. What will happen to the US military contingent on the Korean peninsula?

In the South Korean media also added that Seoul is betting on the US military contingent as “a guarantor of security on the peninsula in a neighborhood with a state such as China.” That is, now the stay of Americans in the Republic of Korea is beginning to be linked to “protection from China”? Quickly, so to speak, the security paradigms are changing, and here it was clearly not without clues from American partners.

If Seoul himself surrendered, then from his side to expect all the requested concessions from Pyongyang – is already too presumptuous.

For reference: at the moment in South Korea is one of the largest US military contingents in the region, numbering almost 30 thousand troops.